Coral Reef News

{"contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"jbruno"}

Danger signals from Great Barrier Reef

A reefscape from the Great Barrier Reef
Credit: AIMS Long Term Monitoring Program

I'm a professor of marine ecology an UNC Chapel Hill and have been working on coral reef ecology and conservation for nearly twenty years. But I only recently became aware of the threat to reefs posed by ocean acidification.

New research indicates that the buildup of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is slowing the growth of reef-building corals by increasing the acidity of the world's oceans. By burning immense amounts of fossil fuels, humans have increased the concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere by nearly 40%. Roughly a quarter of this CO2 is being absorbed by oceans, where it reacts with seawater to form carbonic acid, acidifying the upper layers of the ocean.

Several laboratory experiments suggest this could make it more difficult for corals and other organisms such as crabs and clams to secrete the calcium carbonate skeletons they depend on for survival. The increased acidity essentially makes it more energetically costly to secrete skeletons and could eventually literally dissolve them.

A new research article published today in Science magazine (De'ath, et al. 2009) and reported on msnbc.com takes the case for ocean acidification a step further. The article suggests that the recent man-made increase in ocean acidity has reduced the growth rate of reef-building corals. A team of scientists from the Australian Institute of Marine Science measured the growth of hundreds of corals from 69 reefs on the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) in Australia. The team took cores of the coral skeletons and measured annual growth rings going back 400 years. Their results indicate that the vertical extension of massive, long-lived corals has slowed by roughly 13% since 1990. This decrease in growth coincides with an increase in the acidity of tropical oceans.

I think this is a very important study. And the findings are frankly pretty scary.

Slower growth might not seem like a big problem, but reef scientists are concerned that this will exacerbate the impacts of other threats to coral reefs. For example, it will slow the vertical growth of corals, making it harder for them to keep up with rising sea levels. It could also slow recovery from other disturbances such as coral bleaching episodes and destructive storms.

We are increasing the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere faster even than the IPCC worse-case-scenario. And there is a lag of many decades between the addition of CO2 and the resulting increase in ocean acidity. So we will almost certainly see this problem grow over the next few centuries. The only questions are by how much, how quickly corals can acclimate to climate change and what the broader impacts will be.

Corals create the physical structure that thousands of other species depend on. They play a role analogous to trees that create forests. When corals die, so do the fish and invertebrate animals that live on reefs.

When they are working properly, coral reefs provide human societies with massive economic benefits through fisheries, tourism and invaluable services like buffering from storms. I often refer to reefs as the ATMs of the sea. By allowing reefs to become degraded, we are forfeiting a gigantic natural service; an opportunity cost that will have to be paid by diverting revenue from other sources. If the dire forecasts about the impacts of climate change on coral reefs are accurate, it seems likely that millions of people will lose their livelihoods.

I just got back from a quick trip to Heron Island Research Station on the Great Barrier Reef , where I plan to live and work for nine months in 2010. It is an almost indescribably amazing place. The GBR may not be pristine, but it is the closest thing to an intact ocean ecosystem I have ever experienced. Top predators like sharks are plentiful and their prey are nervous. To an ecologist, those are important signs of a healthy food web. The corals are wildly diverse and relatively abundant. I usually work in highly degraded marine ecosystems. So seeing the GBR gave me a fresh perspective on the way the world use to be and a strong sense of hope that reefs can be saved.

What can we do to mitigate the impacts of climate change on coral reefs? I'd like to see more bikes, more solar panels, and more nuclear power plants. Better batteries wouldn't hurt either. I'd also be happy to have a permanent $1-$2 per gallon gas tax imposed in the US. This would encourage conservation and solidify the recent move to smaller cars. But more importantly, it would promote the development of alternate energy technologies by reducing market risk.

There are many technological and lifestyle solutions. I understand the hesitation people have in implementing them. But the threats are real and given the enormous value of natural ecosystems, the investment is a sound one. Think of it as changing the oil in your car or wearing your seat belt. Simple precautions to avoid potentially catastrophic consequences.

Related Articles
Great Barrier Reef coral in crisisAssociated PressThu Jan 138Comments
{"contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"jbruno"}
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
{"commentId":4625462,"authorDomain":"jwilgis-1"}

you are right, global environmental conditions make for a bad future for the reef system.  The good news is that corals have been around before man and will last after him. In the meantime I intend to dive on them and enjoy them as much as possible.  BTW the only people I have ever seen touching or damaging a reef underwater are so called scientists.

{"commentId":4625462,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"jwilgis-1"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Jan 1, 2009 5:39 PM EST
{"commentId":4625618,"authorDomain":"jbruno"}

jbwayb, you are right in saying corals will outlast people. But most coral species are not threatened; the reefs they create is what we are trying to conserve.  Trees will outlast people too, but we are loosing tropical forests at an astonishing rate.  Although corals have been around for hundreds of millions of years, our current reefs are only 4,000-10,000 years old.  The are pretty sensitive to environmental conditions and do not exist when CO2 levels are wrong, sea level is falling or rising too fast, etc.

{"commentId":4625618,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"jbruno"}
  • 5 votes
#1.1 - Thu Jan 1, 2009 6:01 PM EST
Reply
{"commentId":4626091,"authorDomain":"foxx-jimmy"}

I think that it is an absolute shame the way we treat our natural resources. The coral reefs of the ocean are an integral part of the overall heath of most of the animals that live on or near the coasts. They in turn support the animals that live much deeper in the oceans as well. For us as a community of intelligent human beings to allow these reefs to die is to say to the World itself you are not important.

{"commentId":4626091,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"foxx-jimmy"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#2 - Thu Jan 1, 2009 6:52 PM EST
{"commentId":4626790,"authorDomain":"bemad1"}

The oceans, both gaseous and liquid, are dying, dieing, dyeing, going away, passing on, evaporating, saturationing, being killed, and are, thanks to us, who, are also, beyond redemption.  Well, that is, unless millions and millions of people come together at the same time with a properly founded plan that's executable.  I'll probably be star dust around then, but will attempt to remain optimistic.

{"commentId":4626790,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"bemad1"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#3 - Thu Jan 1, 2009 8:20 PM EST
{"commentId":4626993,"authorDomain":"justinzimm"}

Corals are also living at their upper thermal limit.  When the oceans warm to around 30C it's going to be lights out for the worlds reefs.  IMO this is going to happen before the pH falls far enough to do much damage.  Lets hope the new admin. will follow the lead of Europe and start taking CO2 levels more seriously.

{"commentId":4626993,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"justinzimm"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#4 - Thu Jan 1, 2009 8:45 PM EST
{"commentId":4627246,"authorDomain":"chriscrobertson"}

Hmmmm. Just wondering if the so-called build-up of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere resulted in the extinction of the dinosaurs, too?  The truth is that species have come and gone, sea levels have risen and fallen, and dramatic changes have occured to earth over the last five billion years without any influence from man.  I'm not saying that presently man is not influencing the environment because clearly we are.  We probably have had some impact upon the health of coral reefs around the world.  But some changes to the earth's ecosystem are natural and I doubt we can change or even influence them. 

We should strive to be more energy effiecient and conserve our resouces, no doubt.  But let's be pragmatic, too, and a little less political. 

By the way, if the author needs an assistant for that ninth month gig on an island conducting 'research' on the Great Barrier Reef I'm available ! 

{"commentId":4627246,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"chriscrobertson"}
    Reply#5 - Thu Jan 1, 2009 9:24 PM EST
    {"commentId":4627345,"authorDomain":"chriscrobertson"}

    Maybe the so-called build-up in the atmosphere of carbon dioxide is impacting the coral reefs, and maybe it's not.  Species have come and gone, sea levels have risen and fallen, and dramatic changes to the earth's ecosystem have occured over the last five billion years without any influence from man.  Yes, we need to do a better job of respecting the environment and conserving our resources.  But let's be pragmatic before subscribing to draconian and unproven 'feel-good' legislation. 

    By the way, if the author needs a research assistant for that ninth month gig on an island on the Great Barrier Reef, I'm available ! 

    {"commentId":4627345,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"chriscrobertson"}
    • 2 votes
    Reply#6 - Thu Jan 1, 2009 9:36 PM EST
    {"commentId":4628395,"authorDomain":"Max1"}
    Max-788124Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

    I doubt the author will need an idiot like you on his research team.

    {"commentId":4628395,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"Max1"}
    • 3 votes
    #6.1 - Thu Jan 1, 2009 11:38 PM EST
    {"commentId":4632685,"authorDomain":"chriscrobertson"}
    skepticscientistExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

    Why do you have to get personal Maxy ?  Can't tolerate a little debate from 'the other side' ?  Put down the kool-aid, pick up a science book, and open your mind.

    {"commentId":4632685,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"chriscrobertson"}
      #6.2 - Fri Jan 2, 2009 11:41 AM EST
      {"commentId":4634476,"authorDomain":"tyler"}

      Both of you hush with the personal stuff.

      I just got back from a quick trip to Heron Island Research Station on the Great Barrier Reef, where I plan to live and work for nine months in 2010. It is an almost indescribably amazing place. The GBR may not be pristine, but it is the closest thing to an intact ocean ecosystem I have ever experienced. Top predators like sharks are plentiful and their prey are nervous.

      That sounds fantastic, John. Do your students have opportunities to go places like that? Where do they do field work?

      {"commentId":4634476,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"tyler"}
      • 3 votes
      #6.3 - Fri Jan 2, 2009 1:34 PM EST
      Reply
      {"commentId":4630393,"authorDomain":"cynmoon"}

      Those of us in the environmental profession (biologists, env. engineers/scientists), know that the scientists have been "ringing the bell" on the decline of the coral reefs & oceans, for going onto a couple of decades, now.  Sad to say... and there's no satisfaction in saying "I/we told you so", when it is all gone -- and us, with it. Suggest everyone and everyone they know pick up (from library/whatever) and read "Hot, Flat & Crowded" - by Thomas Friedman, Pulitzer Prize winning author... just came out in 2008 ... before its too late  - and we only have a small, very small window, to change the way we do things (humanity) 

      {"commentId":4630393,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"cynmoon"}
      • 2 votes
      Reply#7 - Fri Jan 2, 2009 8:33 AM EST
      {"commentId":4630525,"authorDomain":"swpv"}

      The average person does not even know what the Barrier Reef is and could care less.  The average person does not live near a glacier or ice cap and could care less.  The average person dislikes any extreme weather and only complains generically when they experience such.  The average Westerner has enough to eat and as long as this continues, will regard warnings of peril with great skepticism.  Were the Great Barrier Reef and half the Amazon Rain Forest to disappear, all Africa become a desert, the glaciers of the Alps dwindle to nothing and the Arctic become ice free all summer, none of this would dissuade coal burners across the planet and none of this would stop the quest for more oil and natural gas. Too many humans will likely consume fossil fuels until or unless the become fossils as well.  It is a pity that renewable energy is so grossly ignored.

      {"commentId":4630525,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"swpv"}
      • 3 votes
      Reply#8 - Fri Jan 2, 2009 8:47 AM EST
      {"commentId":4631189,"authorDomain":"jbruno"}

      Richard (and others), how can the average person be made to care about reefs, tropical rainforests and other far away places and people?  I try to make the point that reefs are not just pretty, but that they are economically really valuable too.  But the people receiving the value live half way around the world from most north Americans.  Then the argument goes that these people and families are being hurt econonically by our choices.  Maybe this is a lame argument...

      {"commentId":4631189,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"jbruno"}
      • 3 votes
      #8.1 - Fri Jan 2, 2009 9:50 AM EST
      {"commentId":4683750,"authorDomain":"quinnwr"}

      john bruno-

      Thanks for the article. No matter where somebody stands on the issue it is a needed and valuable discussion. (disregarding the trolls). I look forward to more from you and your specialty in the future. We all have a lot to learn and decide. Thanks.

      {"commentId":4683750,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"quinnwr"}
      • 1 vote
      #8.2 - Tue Jan 6, 2009 11:28 AM EST
      Reply
      {"commentId":4630554,"authorDomain":"jessedmiller"}

      Having been a Coral Reef Biologist in the past, I can say that the problems will not be rectified until:  1) Governments start seriously funding research on Coral Reefs and Coral Reef Diseases 2) We find sustainable jobs for the people living in areas that harbor coral reefs (dynamite and cyanide fishing as well as overfishing (conch) being some of the problem) 3) We stop overbuilding the areas around coral reefs with resorts and golf courses.

      The Reefs are up against too many factors to possibly make it out on their own.

      {"commentId":4630554,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"jessedmiller"}
      • 2 votes
      Reply#9 - Fri Jan 2, 2009 8:50 AM EST
      {"commentId":4630612,"authorDomain":"swpv"}

      Solutions to excess greenhouse gas: more and better insulation, white paint, higher efficiency appliances and lighting, better windows, plug in hybrid electric vehicles, solar water heaters, solar electricity, wind electricity, small hydro electricity, geothermal, nuclear, some biofuels.  Smaller homes, less consumption, less packaging, more recycling, more walking, more bicycles, more goods on trains instead of trucks.  Retrofit of existing buildings including apartments with energy improvements.  More food grown in home gardens.  More home canning and freezing of home grown food.  More support of local farmers. Grass fed beef instead of grain fed.  Free range chickens instead of caged.  Pig manure used for biofuel.  Old water wheel sites turned into cogenerating, small hydroelectric sites, aerospace and aircraft contractors building more wind turbines, plug in hybrid electric vehicles charged with solar electricity, bio fuel from restaurant waste, competitionand cooperation to become the most efficient.

      {"commentId":4630612,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"swpv"}
      • 2 votes
      Reply#10 - Fri Jan 2, 2009 8:57 AM EST
      {"commentId":4631220,"authorDomain":"jbruno"}

      All excellent solutions Richard. Thanks.

      To be clear, biofuels from the sources you mention are great. Those from crops (corn, etc) are a terrible idea that will do essentially nothing to reduce climate change and causes all sorts of new problems. 

      {"commentId":4631220,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"jbruno"}
      • 1 vote
      #10.1 - Fri Jan 2, 2009 9:53 AM EST
      Reply
      {"commentId":4631173,"authorDomain":"sdlugo"}

      I was diving at the GBR about a month ago. It was my first trip out to a coral reef and I was amazed at what I saw. I had no idea that it would be that beautiful and that phenomenal. However the reason I went was because I would like to see this before it's gone. It's terrible that we understand what is going on and have seen it coming for so long, but world leadership has done very minimal as to slow it. Hopefully with the new US administration coming in that we can start to put more of an empasis on knowledge and action. It's very difficult to be optimistic with the things I read, and seeing people's general attitudes about the subject of global warming, but I am trying.

      {"commentId":4631173,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"sdlugo"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#11 - Fri Jan 2, 2009 9:48 AM EST
      {"commentId":4631640,"authorDomain":"Kboy"}

      Follow the studies and look who is funding them before you accept the notion that our emmissions are the root cause of this.  What is the baseline and how far back did we observe the reefs to come to these conclusions?  Going back a decade or two for a reef that is many thousands of years old is little more than short trend watching.  I would suggest keeping fishing boats and local scavengers (as well as tourists) off the reefs as well as checking is there is sewage anywhere nearby flowing.  To use this to bolster the Al Gore/Green movement to cap Western oil/gas use is just part of the new psuedo-scienence movement to "spead the wealth" and will surley make our lights go dim and our living conditions suffer. 

      Look  to Indonesia and where a reef was destroyed by a tidal wave and is starting to grow back on its own.  Where does CO2 play in that scean?

      {"commentId":4631640,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"Kboy"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#12 - Fri Jan 2, 2009 10:27 AM EST
      {"commentId":4636656,"authorDomain":"jbruno"}

      Going back a decade or two for a reef that is many thousands of years old is little more than short trend watching. 

      I agree, but the study went back 500 years.

      I would suggest keeping fishing boats and local scavengers (as well as tourists) off the reefs as well as checking is there is sewage anywhere nearby flowing. 

      The GBR is generally well-managed in terms of tourism and fishing.  There are problems from terrestrial runoff on the near shore reefs, but the offshore reefs are large isolated from this.

      To use this to bolster the Al Gore/Green movement to cap Western oil/gas use is just part of the new psuedo-scienence movement to "spead the wealth" and will surley make our lights go dim and our living conditions suffer. 

      Jeez, don't bash us scientists just cause Al Gore has appointed himself are our leader!  We never elected him for this role.

      Look  to Indonesia and where a reef was destroyed by a tidal wave and is starting to grow back on its own.  Where does CO2 play in that scean?

      Yeah, good point.  There has been some nice recovery there and in lots of other places (I have published on such recovery in Jamaica and reefs I saw devastated by bleaching in Palau in 1998 are recovering nicely).  There are actually many signs of hope.  I didn't say acidification is currently preventing reefs from recovering.  I said that IN THE FUTURE it could SLOW RECOVERY.   The point of the study and my article is that we are just now getting glimpses of this growing future threat.

      {"commentId":4636656,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"jbruno"}
      • 2 votes
      #12.1 - Fri Jan 2, 2009 4:02 PM EST
      Reply
      {"commentId":4633843,"authorDomain":"tang"}

      Clipped to Newsvine Science and OceanVine!

      {"commentId":4633843,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"tang"}
      • 3 votes
      Reply#13 - Fri Jan 2, 2009 12:54 PM EST
      {"commentId":4639047,"authorDomain":"pinkpanther87413"}

      As long as countries dump toxic wate in our oceans, with no time, to fit the crime.. things will never change for the better, only worst. We store nuclear wast underground,Russia dumps it into the ocean. We have hurricanes and floods backwashing chemicals in bulk back into the ocean in the Gulf.Then come the oil spills,my ain't we a destructive force of nature, on this planet.. I can only hope the planet outlast it's destructors...Seeing we can't even get back on the moon...We have wasted our entire exsistence destroying this planet, and you think it can be fixed in ones life time,,try again. Global warming is still just a debate.. It's not even taken as truth yet!!! So we start when???

      {"commentId":4639047,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"pinkpanther87413"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#14 - Fri Jan 2, 2009 6:41 PM EST
      {"commentId":4646248,"authorDomain":"BLOG23"}

      GO GREEN! Research the internet for hundreds of ways YOU can go green in your life & home.  PASS IT ON.

      {"commentId":4646248,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"BLOG23"}
      • 2 votes
      Reply#15 - Sat Jan 3, 2009 11:38 AM EST
      {"commentId":4650037,"authorDomain":"brisle9"}

      Hello I am a saltwater hobbist ,I have 130gallon saltwater reef aqurium . and let me tell you it has can be very taxeing at time's over the years   . I have found that over the time ,i was doing all this when my peramitors were not right ,certain corals suffered but others didn't show any wear and tear . but all my sps didn't  do so  well, but soft corals did okay . it has taught me how senitive are oceans really are . I did find that the biggest problem was always the Ph level or the temp. The biggest problem was the n2 when it gets out of wack my stoney corals suffered the most ,the soft corals suffered but can take a little more abuse . . In the great lakes in north america  they add a mussle called zedra mussle . and it has helped with the polution there  . Why not find a coral that can survive the more harsh  envioment were out falls are located and transplant them there . to help suck up the harsh polutens . shelfish would work .  just my honest opion .

      {"commentId":4650037,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"brisle9"}
      • 2 votes
      Reply#16 - Sat Jan 3, 2009 5:19 PM EST
      {"commentId":4663761,"authorDomain":"jbruno"}

      Hi Reffertoo,

      Thanks for that.  My aquaria skills are too poor to keep corals alive, but I have learned a lot from coral aqarium hobbiest friends. 

      The zebra mussel was acidentally introduced and is wreaking havoc in the great lakes and is moving into interior streams.  It does clarify the water as you say which has promoted the return of benthic plants...

      {"commentId":4663761,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"jbruno"}
        #16.1 - Sun Jan 4, 2009 8:31 PM EST
        Reply
        {"commentId":4650506,"authorDomain":"foxx-jimmy"}

        It is interesting that I haven't heard anyone refer to the vast amounts of fertilizers and other pollutants that are equally responsible for the destruction. Cars and refrigerators are not the only pollutants.

        {"commentId":4650506,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"foxx-jimmy"}
        • 3 votes
        Reply#17 - Sat Jan 3, 2009 6:04 PM EST
        {"commentId":4663809,"authorDomain":"jbruno"}

        Jim, Many or most my colleagues do think nutrient pollution and terrestrial runoff are one of the major causes of coral loss.  I have worked on how nutrients can increase the severity of coral diseases, so I am sympatheic to the argument (you can download the paper here if you are interested, it is Bruno et al. 2003). 

        But my personal opinon is that nutrient pollution has played only a minor and very localized role in reef degradation.  On some reefs it is an issue.  But I think on most, it isn't.  Overall, you see many of the same sysptoms of decline in very isolated reefs, far from people and with no pollution.  Suggesting larger scale processes are responsible.

        {"commentId":4663809,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"jbruno"}
        • 1 vote
        #17.1 - Sun Jan 4, 2009 8:36 PM EST
        Reply
        {"commentId":4657458,"authorDomain":"foxx-jimmy"}

        John, I wanted to ask you about the efforts to use mild electric stimulization to enhance the corals ability to ward of disease. Has there been any headway made in this area? And if there has, could this be a possible solution given the fact that in the short term there will be no lasting concessions that could bring the change needed to fix this ecological disaster?

        {"commentId":4657458,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"foxx-jimmy"}
        • 3 votes
        Reply#18 - Sun Jan 4, 2009 10:36 AM EST
        {"commentId":4663731,"authorDomain":"jbruno"}

        Jim, I haven't seen Tom Goreau's biorock system running in the field.  And there are no peer-reviewed papers on how effective it really is.  But based on reports from Tom, it does indeed increase coral growth.  It could, I suppose, be effective speeding recovery locally.  But obviously, not at very large scales.   The other criticisms of the program are that it requires lots of electricity, and thus fossil fuels (in most locations) and this contributes to an underlying cause of coral loss.  It doesn't mitigate the other threats either.  And also that it requires tones of cables and wires in the water and is dang ugly.  I don't see it is a broad solution...

        {"commentId":4663731,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"jbruno"}
        • 1 vote
        #18.1 - Sun Jan 4, 2009 8:28 PM EST
        {"commentId":4664687,"authorDomain":"foxx-jimmy"}

        John, I believe that you are a well qualified individual that clearly has thought long and hard about the problems that our coral reefs and oceans are experiencing right now. I believe that the solution to this problem is going to encompass many, many, different ideals, concessions, technologies and unprecedented cooperation among the peoples and governments of this World. It is my only hope that individuals, like yourself, with the knowledge and passion find a way to change this disasterous path that we have stepped on. I like to add that a few ugly cables would be well tolerated given the alternatives, that is if it works at all..........

        {"commentId":4664687,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"foxx-jimmy"}
        • 1 vote
        #18.2 - Sun Jan 4, 2009 10:00 PM EST
        Reply
        {"commentId":4668104,"authorDomain":"mtomlinson"}

        This whole man made global warming situation is getting so bad that I am at my wits end.  My cat threw up a hair ball on Saturday.  After some careful scientific investigation, I have come to the conclusion that it was caused by man made global warming.  We need to shut down all industry, live in caves and eat bugs and fungus.  No cooking fires and taking care that we do not eat a threatened species of insects or plant life.  This is the end of human domination of "Mother Earth"  It is the apocalypse!  We have squandered all of "Mother Earth's" treasures on meaningless and selfish human depravity such as staying warm and eating processed, "non-organic" foods.  The pot smokers and LSD using hippies were right all along.  Those damn industrialists are killing us and our grandchildren for the sake of their own selfish greed.  Keep these gloom & doom articles coming.  Fill the newspapers, computer desktops and nightly news with the "facts" of the horrible tragedy wrought by the right wing, religious fanatic, money grabbing industrial leaders.  Let's take back our Earth and let Al Gore, the UN and P.E.T.A. control our lives for our own good and survival.  Where is Rachael Carson when you need her?  Her "scientific" studies resulted in millions of deaths from malaria.  Eliminating DDT helped malaria infect millions of people that would have contributed to man made global warming.

        Eat a polar bear!  Despite the rumour, they have not only thrived, but have increased dramatically since the 70's

        In conclusion:  Send us some global warming to Ohio.  It's been a very cold winter so far!

        {"commentId":4668104,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"mtomlinson"}
          Reply#19 - Mon Jan 5, 2009 9:03 AM EST
          {"commentId":4683312,"authorDomain":"chriscrobertson"}

          President George W. Bush created three national monuments in the Pacific Ocean on Tuesday (1-6-09), protecting waters near US-controlled islands that contain a rich diversity of corals, fish and other sea life as well as unusual geological formations in the world’s deepest undersea trench.

          With the stroke of a pen, Bush has set aside more square miles of ocean for protection than any other political leader in history.

          {"commentId":4683312,"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401","authorDomain":"chriscrobertson"}
            Reply#20 - Tue Jan 6, 2009 11:00 AM EST
            {"canLink":false,"threadId":"458205","isPrivate":false}
            Leave a Comment:
            You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
            As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
            {"threadId":"458205","contentId":"2262401"}
            Start TrackingStart Tracking
            Stop TrackingStop Tracking
            RSS feedSyndicate this contentRecent Articles & Seeds
            {"numToShow":"25","section":"jbruno","moduleId":2842,"moduleOptions":"a,v,x,25,t,a,1"}
            john bruno's Latest Comments
            john bruno's Recent Votes
            john bruno has not voted for any articles or seeds yet.
            Comments & Feedback